Ratification of the Constitution Indexes | Index to Volumes 4–7: Ratification of the Constitution by the States: Massachusetts | R | Ratification, Procedure for
– after mature consideration adopt or amend [1 reference]
– amendments should be adopted before ratifying [6 references]
– proposed recommendatory amendments are unacceptable [1 reference]
– Article VII of Constitution quoted [1 reference]
– Article XIII of Articles of Confederation quoted [1 reference]
– debate over as violation of Articles of Confederation [16 references]
– conditional ratification is really a rejection [2 references]
– Congress transmits Constitution to states [23 references]
– debate over role of Congress in transmitting Constitution to states [11 references]
– Constitution can be adopted with conditional amendments [1 reference]
– Constitution should be adopted without condition of amendments [1 reference]
– Constitution is not being crammed down throats of people [1 reference]
– Constitution should be ratified as unanimously as possible [1 reference]
– Constitution should be ratified by the people [1 reference]
– Constitution should be rejected even without an alternative available [1 reference]
– if Constitution fails, Confederation is still in effect [1 reference]
– is a farce because Constitution isn’t what it purports to be [1 reference]
– Constitutional Convention submits Constitution to people in the states for ratification [2 references]
– criticism of Constitutional Convention resolutions for [1 reference]
– danger of ratifying with slim majority [1 reference]
– examination of has been long and thorough [1 reference]
– Federalists are trying to cram Constitution down throats of Americans [1 reference]
– five states have ratified [1 reference]
– Elbridge Gerry’s views on [3 references]
– Nathaniel Gorham opposes using state legislatures in ratifying [1 reference]
– Hampden’s conditional ratification outlined [1 reference]
– important that all the states ratify [1 reference]
– Rufus King favors use of state conventions and nine states [1 reference]
– Mass. amendments recommendatory only [2 references]
– Mass. Convention has no right to propose amendments to Constitution [1 reference]
– Mass. method of ratification as model [3 references]
– Mass. should be one of four non-ratifying states [2 references]
– Mass. should wait to see what other states do before it ratifies [3 references]
– attempt to undo Mass. ratification [2 references]
– call for conditional ratification in Mass. [1 reference]
– danger if Mass. Convention ratifies by a small majority [1 reference]
– Constitution must be accepted or rejected by Mass. Convention [1 reference]
– Constitution should have been sent to towns for their consideration [2 references]
– importance of avoiding anything inflammatory after Mass. ratification [1 reference]
– importance of Mass. to [2 references]
– incompatible with allegiance of citizens of Mass. for their commonwealth [2 references]
– in Mass. resolution appointing delegates to Constitutional Convention [1 reference]
– a minority of people in U.S. could ratify Constitution [2 references]
– moderation and deliberateness suggested [11 references]
– N.Y Senate opposes calling a convention [1 reference]
– newspaper propaganda estimate of number of people who now support Constitution [1 reference]
– opposition to [1 reference]
– opposition after ratification would produce evils [2 references]
– people’s assent is necessary but will be ignored after ratification [1 reference]
– praise of use of ratifying conventions elected by people [2 references]
– praised by Jarvis, Parsons, and Widgery [1 reference]
– ratifying all or nothing [13 references]
– compared with Shays’s Rebellion [1 reference]
– sister states of Mass. are divided over Constitution [1 reference]
– speedy ratification criticized [28 references]
– speedy adoption needed [7 references]
– objection to mere recommendations for state conventions [1 reference]
– criticism of bypassing approval of state legislatures [1 reference]
– need to call state ratifying conventions [1 reference]
– one state should not dictate to the Union [1 reference]
– and requirement that only nine states necessary to ratify [7 references]
– other states will agree to amendments [1 reference]
– total or partial rejection is advised [1 reference]
– unanimity is impossible [1 reference]
– no viable union of nine states without Mass., N.Y., Va., and N.C. [1 reference]
– what happens to non-ratifying states [8 references]
– willingness to acquiesce if Constitution is adopted [1 reference]