
| Dear Olmsted, | VAUX & WITHERS, Architects, No. 110 Broadway, New-York. May 12th 1865. | 
I hope my last reached you safely and found you pretty well. I wish you were nearer at hand. I met Green today in the street, he told me, as if it were a matter of course, that all further proceedings in regard to the gateways had been stopped. He was painfully mild and I expect there have been some unpleasant scenes, perhaps Moses H. did not like the erasing comment. If he objects I will quote the direct forgery of my name in enclosed wood cut signed by me, Olmsted & Vaux Landscape Archts, but he will not object. I am very gentle with him except when he tries to frighten me and says that I am making the members of the Commission inimical. I then say in distinct terms I expected that and I
[361 ]
]
                        
 
                           View of Bow Bridge Area, Central Park
I am not committed to Brooklyn and mean they should see my letter first. Green recommends Rand as Engineer. I approve as Rand is satisfactory to me. I told him I did not want Grant. Pilat says Grant has been unfaithful to our interests. I think it very likely that he has and if it has not been done in a mean way, I naturally enquire what our interests have done for him that he should not be unfaithful to them. But I expect he has acted queerly. Pilat is a gentleman & a trump and deserves all we can ever do for him. I should expect to get him a position at Brooklyn if he were inclined to take it. He may be docile but I would not have referred so particularly to that if I had been you.
It certainly is not disadvantageous to us to have the Boulevard & the Zoological Garden in the hands of the Central P. C. and you may remember that I wrote you that it accorded with my views. It is as well to have things where you can lay your hand on them. The Goats have eaten up most of the trees and the Dandelions prevent the grass from being seen and Pilat says the lawns will have to be ploughed, the playground also wants to be occupied, &c &c.
You have never given me much moral support in the plan of campaign that I recommended and have adopted. You know I always argued that if we could but get the money spent on our plan that then we should be independent of the Commission. Your theory was different
[362 ]and I always felt that it would be a most dangerous ground to take. Management against management at that intermediate stage for the C.P.C. must be management or nothing. I am not going into this now for it is too delicate a subject with you who have such strong feelings in regard to it, but what is the state of the case today. I am mixed up in these affairs and am proceeding in a very half and half sort of way for alone I am a very incomplete Landscape Architect and you are off at the other end of the world, depriving the public of your proper services as I argue. My position is that the art element ought to have been the controlling one from the first. I have always striven to sustain that view and I felt that you were the head artist in the park matter. Art against Commission is easily understood. Now we can say take your Reports and account books. We will take our Park. I have always upheld your art position hoping that you would someday realise that it was your best foundation to build whatever you want on. You were in too great a hurry I think. The Commrs saw too much Archt in Chief signature and were induced to listen to Green who of course could represent this view and get them to leave things in his hands. Now what is the state of things?
]and I always felt that it would be a most dangerous ground to take. Management against management at that intermediate stage for the C.P.C. must be management or nothing. I am not going into this now for it is too delicate a subject with you who have such strong feelings in regard to it, but what is the state of the case today. I am mixed up in these affairs and am proceeding in a very half and half sort of way for alone I am a very incomplete Landscape Architect and you are off at the other end of the world, depriving the public of your proper services as I argue. My position is that the art element ought to have been the controlling one from the first. I have always striven to sustain that view and I felt that you were the head artist in the park matter. Art against Commission is easily understood. Now we can say take your Reports and account books. We will take our Park. I have always upheld your art position hoping that you would someday realise that it was your best foundation to build whatever you want on. You were in too great a hurry I think. The Commrs saw too much Archt in Chief signature and were induced to listen to Green who of course could represent this view and get them to leave things in his hands. Now what is the state of things?
I have tided things along and take a strong position for both of us today, although we are both supposed to be dead and buried two years ago. I mean my letter. As I told Green, before it was printed when he asked if anything would come of it, “It marks an era in Park matters.” Hitherto they have been living on what they found in the houses of the murdered men, but the day for that ceases and the cloven foot appears. Now comes our opportunity. My object has been to make a clean connection and an intelligible statement before the public when the hour arrived. That is why I resigned. We must preserve our record clear for the day of battle. Your management business is just as capable of lucid statement. Hitherto you have failed to find in these matters a congenial outlet for your ambition and rather pooh pooh plans &c. I attribute all this to the lack of experience you have had. The Brooklyn Park is all our own. I shall tell them that I intend to ask you to go into it with me anyway & will write to you what bargain I make. I consider the C.P.C. in a very weak position but it may take longer than I suppose to bring matters to a crisis. Our right unquestionably is to control matters from Washington Heights to the other side of Brooklyn—a nice view of the sea we get from the additional ground taken in.
17th Green has been in to see me, nominally in reply to my enquiry as to Rand purposely made to give him a chance to talk. You see it is now several weeks since my letter to the President and no reply or notice taken of it. There is of course no dodging it, it stands in their path and if the design is not erected we succeed. He feels a little better as no more whacks have been administered since and evidently hopes that very few people have happened to notice it. He asked me what next &c, and
[363 ]in the end, I said that we were going to defend the design either in the Commission or out of it. He said he did not see how we could be appointed Commissioners &c. I said we did not want to sit with these gentlemen particularly but we could stand it if they could. I said all this because it is the only logical way out of his difficulties. We are all right. The Commission is all popcock and only needs a few punctures to let people see that it is A.H.G. under another name. I recognized his claims to consideration and said that I had always said with you that if he must have the position, he had earned it. I did not of course go much into this. I always felt you know that you were a little insatiable in your ambition and that your theory left no room for Green or anybody else—and that we ought to have provided for him. I recognise your claims exactly as you and I have agreed on and want to see you in the right place again, but have always contended that the park is not a proper boundary. I wonder if you think any differently or like our work any better as a permanent thing than you used to. After the first seven years you gave me Leah; after another seven, will you give me Rachel.
]in the end, I said that we were going to defend the design either in the Commission or out of it. He said he did not see how we could be appointed Commissioners &c. I said we did not want to sit with these gentlemen particularly but we could stand it if they could. I said all this because it is the only logical way out of his difficulties. We are all right. The Commission is all popcock and only needs a few punctures to let people see that it is A.H.G. under another name. I recognized his claims to consideration and said that I had always said with you that if he must have the position, he had earned it. I did not of course go much into this. I always felt you know that you were a little insatiable in your ambition and that your theory left no room for Green or anybody else—and that we ought to have provided for him. I recognise your claims exactly as you and I have agreed on and want to see you in the right place again, but have always contended that the park is not a proper boundary. I wonder if you think any differently or like our work any better as a permanent thing than you used to. After the first seven years you gave me Leah; after another seven, will you give me Rachel.
I only value these affairs as opportunities to develop the earnest convictions of my life and I believe my convictions coincide with yours to some extent. It was right that this work should help artists to take a true position. It has not yet, but it is planned to achieve that result. I want to make a “frightful” example of the Commrs and have always had this as a theory so that in the end all the dirt we have had to eat may result in something tangible and these moneyed men may find that artists are their masters. For this, patience is necessary. You do not quite see that now. Your artist capacities are the most needed. The country wants artists. Hitherto you have been a little deceived by mere names. Take it and make it is a good motto. I always liked the title Landscape Architect because—the specialty was fairly embodied. A title that could as easily be transferred to an inartistic public work is not as satisfactory. You see that my position is that our affair was one of long duration and that we are just beginning work. I cannot of course go on forever in this way. I have upheld your art position as well as I knew how and have done enough to show you that success is possible. In the next twenty years Landscape architecture is the thing needed as much as anything. I should rejoice in an entire and complete success over the Commrs for artistic and other reasons not personal but, I do not know enough to triumph singlehanded.
Who are they to get? Who will the public trust?, for their Boulevard and their Zoological Garden? With you we ought to get them. $5000 per annum & $10,000 back pay.
I never expected that this thing would ripen all at once. If you were here now you could. help along travely but of course. It would be of no use to take up the idea with the limited notion of flooring Green and making a name as Park A in C or superintendant. All that must come
[364 ]in as subsidiary to a larger aim to be a benefactor in this matter to the people generally, and this I think with the years of peace before us is as sound a scheme as any you can connect yourself with. I am perhaps deficient in personal ambition—but I can feel for it in others. If you do not see that you are honored by developing this fitness for art work of course—don’t come. It must be art of landscape architecture and art of administration combined. Think this over. We are neither of us old men you know. To me it seems & always has seemed a magnificent opening. Possible together, impossible to either alone.
]in as subsidiary to a larger aim to be a benefactor in this matter to the people generally, and this I think with the years of peace before us is as sound a scheme as any you can connect yourself with. I am perhaps deficient in personal ambition—but I can feel for it in others. If you do not see that you are honored by developing this fitness for art work of course—don’t come. It must be art of landscape architecture and art of administration combined. Think this over. We are neither of us old men you know. To me it seems & always has seemed a magnificent opening. Possible together, impossible to either alone.
C.V.

| [May 14, 1865] | 
[. . .] And if this state of things continues long, it will cost a great deal to re-stock the Estate and re-open the mines. There has been some slight improvement lately in the rate of yield but on the whole the mines are very unpromising. If the condition and prospects of the Estate as I understand them, were known in New York, I should think the Company would fail, and the bondholders would feel as if they had drawn an elephant. If I owned it, I don’t think I would work it. I would rather give it away and put any capital I could command into something else. But others with the same understanding of the facts would not do so, would take the risk of failure in the hope of “striking it rich.”
I am just about out of money—have no further means of paying my salary or expenses. I telegraphed last week for $5000 to be remitted by telegraph. If it comes, I shall be relieved, but if it does not, I shall not quit for the present. We all seem now to have got acclimatized and to be gaining in health and the children are doing so well that we are willing if it should be necessary to stay a little longer at our own expense—it cannot be very long for expenses are frightfully high. But I think I shall stand it till September, which ends my second year of service.
As far as I can now see the chances are that I shall then return to New York simply because at this moment the chances are that the Company will fail—will fail at least to pay me—and it is unlikely that the company or any company or individual owning the Estate will hereafter (be able to) pay $10,000 a year for a manager.
[367 ]
]
                  As to staying in Cala off the Estate I agree with all you say—about the occasion I have to make money if I can, about Cala being the best place to make money (as a general rule) and about the difficulty and danger I should have with a newspaper—but on the other hand I am not the sort to rough it or enter into the rough competition of business in Cala without capital, and after watching for three months for it in San Francisco, I could see no demand for me, except perhaps in the newspaper business, without capital. There are men of high position who would like to make use of me but it is only because they think that I could get capital for them in New York—get up stock companies, of the Mariposa model, for the development of California property of questionable value, which I wouldn’t do if I could. And as I cannot wait here for business, long, as soon as I am relieved of the Estate, I shall probably start for home. Perhaps it will be equally difficult for me to find any business by which I can get a living there, but I can live on my capital twice as long there at least, as I can here, while looking for business. My stocks have fallen a little of late, but I can still reckon on landing in New York with at least $8000—perhaps $10.000.
I am much obliged to you for your course with regard to the Freedman’s Bureau. It was exactly what I would have had you say. I do not much incline to it, because I do not believe the government would allow me to do what I should think best to be done. It would be, I fear, not only a vexatious, aggravating and thankless duty but a puerile pretence & fizzle.
And I do so chafe and worry and run my head against any humbugging business—any compromise—the how not to do it style of work—of which I have seen so much and have become morbidly suspicious, that I must keep clear of it hereafter if I can.
I should do best as President of a Rail Road Company or an Insurance Company—but—as you say—a man needs more than one ten thousd for anything like that. I wish you could find some commission business in which you and I could engage together, wherein a little capital would go a good way and be safe. Some new business lines ought to be opened in New-York by all the changes that the peace and opening of the South will occasion in trade. If the Atlantic telegraph works, I should like to have an agency to collect and transmit news, for the London Telegraphic News Company (Reuter’s successor), or the European Agency for the Associated Press. I have had ever since I have been in this burnt country, a real craving for the English climate. Mary has the same and agrees to live on bread and cheese for a year if I will get the consulship to any slushy old town where there are donkeys to let. Another thing we are agreed upon, that we will never go into the country again where they don’t keep a brook. We have ridden today, and the children climbed on foot, 2500 feet vertically and six miles horizontally to visit a spring. It
[368 ]does not run as much water in a day as a washstand Croton pipe, but it is quite delightful to us. So of the two, I rather prefer the European end, but will take the Western at $4000 a year, provided I can live near a fish market and have other tolerably moist privileges.
]does not run as much water in a day as a washstand Croton pipe, but it is quite delightful to us. So of the two, I rather prefer the European end, but will take the Western at $4000 a year, provided I can live near a fish market and have other tolerably moist privileges.
Can you not learn something thro’ Dudley Field or Potter or otherwise about the Company and what is likely to be done? You seem to think the Trustees swindlers. They deceived me and have not individually kept their word with me, but I have seen nothing which I cannot excuse—nothing which looks necessarily like intentional wrong—in Mr Hoy or Mr Opdyke. So far as I know, they appear to have acted in good faith. And as long as this is so, I am inclined to do the best I can for them.
I am half inclined to ask you to see Field and get him to get me some distinct security against staying here without being paid. They are wrong to leave me in doubt about this, but I will wait a while longer.
I write so entirely about myself, and to no purpose, simply because I am lonely and feel left alone and very much want your advice all the time. The Company don’t ask anything of me, and I don’t know whether I ought to write them my opinion of the Estate or not. I don’t want even negatively to help cheat anybody or maintain false impressions. They have the important facts and are able to judge for themselves what should be done. Your letter indicates that you think there is occasion for a justification of my management. I should like much to know if any of those concerned doubt if my management has been judicious. I wish much that if there is any question of it, it might be thoroughly tried. I am perfectly clear that the duty given me has been well done and that I could satisfy the sufferers of it.
I suppose your doubts about Grant’s originating and controlling the movements of Sherman are fully set at rest. I quite agree with you about England and how much better it would have been for our people to have taken the English gabble in silence. That was my impulse so strongly that I can’t yet feel as if I could talk with an Englishman about it. Nor do I think Englishmen need be expected to understand our—my—view of the war in this generation, after all. But Grant, they will at least do justice to, as a General, I think. And who, as a General, past or present, compares with him? He is as distinctively an American, democratic, General as this has been an American war and like no other. I doubt if he could command a European army in the European way. Would he have done better with a thoroughly trained Etat Major?
I wish you would write in favor of Polytechnic schools to educate officers for volunteers—the military teachers to be supplied (in turn) from the army—the pupils to be taken by competative examination from the common schools (& otherwise). This would give the Federal government
[369 ]a certain duty in regard to Common Schools and lead on at least to an inspectorship and toward a uniform system. The polytechnics might be state schools aided and shaped by federal government, or one or two great West Point schools. The latter would have the advantage of bringing so many together that brigade movements could be had, and we never want volunteer officers higher than Brigadier Generals, at the outbreak of war. I don’t suppose the course should be as complete as the present W. Point. The militia should be officered from graduates. And then the militia should be inspected by regular officers, and there should be a militia Adjutant General system, and a federal Militia bureau.
]a certain duty in regard to Common Schools and lead on at least to an inspectorship and toward a uniform system. The polytechnics might be state schools aided and shaped by federal government, or one or two great West Point schools. The latter would have the advantage of bringing so many together that brigade movements could be had, and we never want volunteer officers higher than Brigadier Generals, at the outbreak of war. I don’t suppose the course should be as complete as the present W. Point. The militia should be officered from graduates. And then the militia should be inspected by regular officers, and there should be a militia Adjutant General system, and a federal Militia bureau.
Now is the time to organize a proper militia and Army Reserve System. The returning volunteers know enough and have the habits of discipline &c. necessary to get it started. It could be done at a tenth of the cost and difficulty that it could a few years hence. The polytechnic education I mean to be something more than military—a sort of college, fitting men generally for any business, the military training being somewhat incidental. Suppose a Military Department were established in connection with any college or great educational institution, in the manner of the Scientific, Theological and Law Departments of Yale—Government endowing it, supplying military professors &c and supplying arms and drilling officers for the whole college. All the pupils of the college are (within their four years) to be drilled and educated up to the requirements of company officers—so as to be fit to take the field as company officers of volunteers—or militia. Such as like may at their own expense (the same as pupils of the Scientific School) take a complete or partial special military course similar to the West Point course, and in addition to these there are to be a certain number of scholarships—equivalent to a nomination to West Point at present—provided by govt. These to be filled by competitions from a selection of the best Common School pupils. All the pupils whether government or otherwise after once entering to be on the same footing and to be equally eligible for appointments to regular army. The selection to be made according to class standing.
I wrote out a scheme of this sort early in the war and read it to Profr Bache, who was much pleased with it. So was Gibbs.
I have a letter from Jenkins by the way, of a strangely doleful tone. He apologizes for an uncontrollable melancholy, but gives me no idea of the grounds of it, except that the San. Com. is in a very bad way and he seems to think that he has in some way been imposed upon. He intimates that he don’t resign only because the war seems so near its end but regrets that he had not before he went to Washington. Do you know anything about it? As far as I can see the Commission has been doing very well of late. I see my own ideas better carried out than they ever were allowed to be before in some respects.
I am surprised that none of the Commissioners ever write to me.
[370 ]
                        Bellows promised to write on some particular matters that I am interested in as soon as he arrived—but I know nothing of them & he hasn’t given me a line or directed anybody else to. I have not heard from Knapp for six months.
]
                        Bellows promised to write on some particular matters that I am interested in as soon as he arrived—but I know nothing of them & he hasn’t given me a line or directed anybody else to. I have not heard from Knapp for six months.
We visited your old friend Mrs Sherwood in S.F. and were most agreeably disappointed with her and her husband. She is a quiet sensible domestic woman—with scarcely a trace left of her old romance and enthusiasms and he, a good natured, nice, thriving business man. She looks well too—and seemed to me altogether much the best of the family. But perhaps all the rest would be found unexpectedly agreeable in California.
Miel, I did not see, but heard about a good deal. He has been most liberally assisted and has a fine school, but he will fail the moment he is left to stand alone—from constitutional inability to succeed. He has crazy expectations and is always ready to run deeply in debt upon them.
Will you please order a card plate and some cards for me. I lost mine when I came out here. I have generally had small capital Roman letters, but want the proper thing, whatever you think it is. I have no idea. Keep the plate and send me fifty cards by mail. I enclose $3_ greenbacks.
I want your advice, first as to whether my character will be injured by remaining here—second whether I am likely to get paid if I do remain.
It will be difficult for you to imagine how perfectly blank I am in knowledge of the company off the Estate. I don’t know who the Trustees are, much less what they are, what they are doing. Mr Hoy has not written me officially or privately since October last—nor has anyone of the Board.
Fred. Law Olmsted.
My oil property has been mainly consolidated and is to [be] sent for sale to New York, with a limit upon the whole. If it should sell at the limit, my interest would be worth $10,000. It will have cost me about $400. I have offered to sell my chance at $1000. The consolidated property amounts to 5000 acres in the San Joaquin valley. There’s no mistake about the oil. We have had several analyses. It is rich in lubricating oil.