Entry  About  Search  Log In  help
Publication
printable version
Go to page: 
961page icon

To John Charles Olmsted

Dear John; The Crossways, Lympstone,
near Exmouth;
12th December, 1895.

Your mother and Marion went off yesterday, their objective point being the purchase of a pony. I do not know where they are but as it is a rainy day I fear they are not having a good time. Rick will, I suppose be on his way to Liverpool returning to you. I am alone in the house with my nurse. Rick has written me of an instructive interview with the authorities at Kew, the most important occurrence of which is the reassurance gained from them of the soundness of the views of what is desirable in the Biltmore arboretum upon which we have been inclined to proceed. His letter to me is short but seems conclusive on that point, which is a relief to me. He must have observed and obtained in conversation much that will be valuable with reference to matters of detail and also must have gained ground which will be valuable with reference to conferences upon questions which are yet to come up. He had seen Robinson, also, with whom a little discussion was desirable as he is inclined to advise a course varying from that which we have adopted in a somewhat different way from that which Profr Sargent would prefer. His letter is brief, having been written on the train as he was proceeding to Paris but it shows that his observations and his discussions at Kew were of a sort that should be extremely valuable to you—in truth, just what were needed at this juncture of that great enterprise. I am much gratified that the result should have been so far satisfactory. I hope that he has learned much that will be of value to you. In the course of the passage across the Atlantic I questioned him closely about a [962page icon]good many matters at Biltmore and in such a manner as to test pretty well the value of the education which he has been getting there. The result was satisfactory on the whole. It needs, of course, to be supplemented by office training such as you will secure for him but I know of no man anywhere, who, at his age, has a working knowledge of as many first rate operations of our profession. I could not test his knowledge of trees and shrubs but his opportunities have been pretty good so far and when supplemented by industrious study at the Arnold he should soon be a fair master. Better after a little time than you or Eliot or I am, and making you more independent of Manning. I mean that, without much special personal study, for a time, of planting, but enough to keep him in training while growing conversant with all other work, he can fit himself to take Manning’s duty in an emergency, or, if found best at last, to take it wholly, with assistants, of course. Better, I mean of course than you were, very much, when you first became active in the work, more especially in knowledge of plants and horticultural processes of all sorts. He must still be very deficient in regard to hot house and conservatory plants & works, and should have studied opportunities and be required to advance in these respects. Systematic arrangements should be made for the purpose. Here lies the principal deficiency of your office at present and it would be greater if Manning were to leave you. Therefore systematic arrangements for Rick’s continuous education in this direction should be made. It must be for you to think out just what is best. I should think that the root of all must be the Bussey with systematic visits and study of a certain number of establishments, such as Mr Huneywell’s, Mrs Gardeners, Mr Ames’s. I am looking forward to the time, close at hand, when the demand upon you in this direction i. e. in regard to exotics mainly under glass will be much greater and more difficult to meet than it yet is, and when it will be absolutely essential to your standing & reputation that your office should be better qualified & equipped than it is. The extent and, within certain limits, the commonness of the culture of plants under glass, appears to be even greater than I had supposed. Here, I mean, in the warmest part of England, where a much greater range of plants may stand out during the winter than elsewhere; There are two little conservatories opening out of the main rooms of this house; each large eno’ to have a table and chairs in it, as well as shelving &c. Otherwise the place is not treated much otherwise, in principle or method from the pond which we laid out for Mr Coolidge in (West) Brookline. That is to say, there is a lawn all along the best face of the house on the West, divided by a very light, almost invisible, wire fence, from a sheep-pastured small field beyond it, the latter divided by a hedge from fields yet further beyond. And the planting has been made on the same principles as ours, but is not as good as ours, being conventional and cheap in thought, suggesting that it has been done by contract, as is probably the case. Every possible care should be taken to guard against this sort of work becoming common in our country. I mean merely conventional work done by men ignorant of principles and incapable of understanding them. The climate favors much here that is agreeable that we [963page icon]cannot have but the ordinary laying out & planting of gentlemen’s places is in the last degree conventionally “unconventional.” It is the result of attempts of wholly uncultured men to work in the manner of cultured men. Nothing is of as much importance in our profession as to avoid this. To avoid an appearance of an attempt to follow rules or fashions inapplicable to local and personal circumstances. There is hardly a place about here; I have hardly yet seen a place in England, that did not betray evidence of this merely conventional way of laying out grounds. Especially this applies to planting. Our methods of planting (I mean as to design) are better than any I have yet seen practiced here, and yet I am sure that they can be improved, and would be if any of us who could afford time to be as painstaking as wd be desirable. On the whole, the common work here is very poor indeed. It is the larger range of a certain class of resources that we cannot, in our Northern work, employ, that makes it more interesting than such work as we do. Giving it time, & study enough in detail, the planting at Biltmore should be much more interesting, and more a work of real art, than any in England. And under such instruction as I last wrote out for Beadle, as to the revision and improvement of the Approach Road, if this shall be followed up for a few years, I believe that it will be. I urge you not to let those instructions be neglected. Read them over when you visit the place again and see that they are followed and are to be followed up continuously in coming years. After a time you will have a finer piece of work there than any I know. I mean verbal as well as written instructions. I think that Beadle & Manning as well as Rick, understand them, though I don’t feel quite sure of their complete sympathy.

I am going down hill rapidly. I have a nurse who, under general instructions from Dr Rainer, (who has not yet seen me), requires me to walk with him a great deal more than I think desirable, causing a rapid pulse and throbbing. It is an hour now since I came in from a walk with him and the urgency of my pulse, singing in my ears is painful. I think that he is compelling me to greatly overdo voluntary exercise. I am much depressed but try not to show it. I pray God to bless you all.

Your affectionate father.

964page icon

To Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr.

Dear Rick. [1895]

There is greatly wanted, and I think that there would be a large market demand, for a really good work on the planting of shrubbery—on shrubbery. There are several books on the subject, very, very pretentious and very very poor. There is not one that is tolerably good. The main error of them is that they are written from the point of view of a botanist rather than of a landscape artist. Look at those which you have with you and you will see this. This is the case with the more pretentious as well as the more humble. In the earlier chapters of Scott there is some effort to present (petty) landscape principles, but in the consideration of particular shrubs there is not often a thought of anything but specemins and rarely for anything but botanical consideration of [965page icon]individuals apart from others, and in a nursery condition—or a condition little beyond that of the nursery plant seen by itself and without the slightest regard for effect as an element of landscape, of grouping or massing, or composition. There is not a single tolerably good work on the subject. There are many very bad ones. Were the subject well and popularly treated in a book which could be made popular, even through public libraries, it would be of great service. It would dignify the life of the author.

I had a notion of undertaking such a book—of compiling such a book—when I was on the Brooklyn Park. My ultimate intention being to present some sort of photographic representations of plants in a fairly mature condition—to show their history. (It is so absurd to show nursery specemins, or extremely immature, or mangled specemins, as most books do). I gave it up when I moved from Brooklyn to Brookline— Then, independently, and without suggestion from me, Harry Codman undertook such a book, associated with Charles Eliot. The occasion, the opportunity, remains. There are many books but not one that comes within gun-shot of what is needed. If you will have in view the making of such a book you need not fear that the material—the observation and the thought that you may be led to give the subject will be wasted. It is extremely improbable that any other book would be made on the same lines that you would determine upon, or that the information that you would collect and the fashion that you would give it, would be adopted by another.

There is a hundred times the need of a good book on shrubs, (or on the planting of limited spaces of ground with some reference to “landscape” effect, where trees (when well grown) would be inconvenient and have bad effect), than there is for any new botanical work, or any more work in landscape planting proper. See my article in the new Johnsons Cyclopedia, (on “Landscape Gardening,” I believe it is—)

The Central Park and the Brooklyn Park must now supply innumerable illustrations of the proper use and of the improper use of shrubs, of the proper and of the improper treatment of them, mostly they would be illustrations of what to avoid, and this largely with respect to pruning, crowding, isolation, and grouping. Rarely in either work are shrubs serving the purpose for which they were planted. This from vicious pruning, from lack of thinning at the proper time &c. Exactly opposite purposes, motives and principles have been had in view by successive gardeners who have been allowed to deal with them— Bushes planted for groups and masses and screens have been treated as specemins while bushes planted to be seen apart, specemin fashion, have been crowded and overgrown and made subordinate to what were planted as temporary nurses. And so on, and so on. There is no possible way of misusing bushes of which illustrations may not be found on both the New York and the Brooklyn Parks— Nay; it is much worse than that. There is no possible motive with regard to which shrubs could have been planted that has not been adopted and discarded and other motives successively had in view. Of late [966page icon]there has been something approaching a return of purpose toward that originally had in view, but with very patchy results, and the frequent introduction of passages (not subordinate to general landscape considerations) of limited local motive. Also a great deal has been lost in trying to make specemins of shrubs originally planted with a view to masses, to groups. A great deal of instruction what to avoid can soon be obtained on the New York and Brooklyn Parks. (Nevertheless I don’t know where one could find better hints and illustrations of what should be aimed at—)

This is simply to set you thinking.

Your affcte father.


The main (literary) work required could be now done at Biltmore better than anywhere else. But the collection of shrubs to be studied and described individually to be found in the Arnold Arboretum will in a year or two be as good as any I know. Taking that with the grouping of various shrubs and the detached shrubs to be found on other public and private grounds about Boston and you could find nowhere else—not even at Kew—a better field of study than is to be had in Boston.