Since our conversation last spring with Senator Morrill about the stair cases I have given much study to the matter and have made and discarded several drawings. I recognized the force of his objections to the place as it stood but have not been able to reconcile myself to his proposition of a cascade. It seems to me that any attainable moderate stream of water seen in the midst of such great architectural masses would be trivial and wanting in scale and dignity. It is difficult to realize how little show a large stream of water makes when moving with a rapid descent.

On the other hand, if this objection could be removed by an adequate body of water, I am afraid that the result would be to lessen the impression of solidity and firm footing so desirable to be sustained at the base of so vast a pile. I have sent you a drawing showing a design which satisfies me better than anything before devised.

[279]

The drawing does not show fairly what I consider the most important modification of the general design but with a little consideration you will realize it. I mean that there is more unity between the centre parts of the terrace and the flanks, and the centre is firmer and more self-supportive. The terrace is simpler, more massive, more classic, perhaps.

[280]

The greater strength given the main wall, justifies, I hope, the variation from the original idea of the fountains between the staircases, by which Senator Morrill’s objection to the high and somewhat blank wall of the lower terrace is overcome and something gained of the sparkle of water that he desired.

The alcoves are designed to be of rough marble; their walls to be covered with evergreen creepers and plants in vases to be set in them.

As shown in the drawing some parts of this work would, it strikes me now, seem a little thin. Of course, this and probably other objections to be made to details may be remedied.

Please consult with Senator Morrill about it.

I will come on at short notice whenever you think it desirable.

Yours Very Truly