| THE HON. E. H. ROLLINS, Chairman of the Joint Committee of Congress on Public Buildings and Grounds. Sir: |
[c. January-February 1882] |
Illustrations are here presented for the more convenient consideration by your Committee of the plan of an architectural terrace, designed to supersede the present earth-work covering the unfinished base of the Capitol.
The perspective on this page {see page 578} is taken from the point which would be occupied by a man coming up the hill in a carriage, where the first unobstructed view of the building would be had. It is at this point that the obscuration of the main walls by the new construction would be greatest. A few yards farther to the eastward there would be none. As this effect of the terrace is the only objection raised to the plan, poles with cross-bars at top have been set in the ground south of the building, showing the height and position of its upper line; and in passing to or from the Capitol on the House side, the Committee may readily see what the objection amounts to. The granite base-course of the present marble walls of the Capitol will be found in looking from the road within the grounds to appear a little above the cross-bars. What remains to be seen of this granite above the line, will in the end be obscured by the foliage to be introduced upon the terrace, and the effect of the arrangement will be to re-establish a granite base on the natural surface of the ground, all the visible structure above being of marble. A better understanding of the facts may be had from the small section on the right of the third page.
The above plan {see page 580} shows the enlargement of the basement room of the Capitol to be gained through the construction of the terrace. The additional space is 1,400 feet long by 60 feet wide, divided into rooms opening from a central corridor. Ten of these correspond in form and dimensions with the best of the present upper committee rooms, each having two or three windows looking upon the existing courts in the same manner as those of the architect’s office in the present basement. These court-yards are to be made attractive winter gardens. (The rooms in question are marked A on the [578
]
View of U.S. Capitol with proposed terrace, by Olmsted
The above plan {see page 581} shows the esplanade or deck of the terrace. It is to be in two parts, the division running midway between the outer walls of the present building and the outer walls of the proposed new work. The inner one of these two parts is to be level with the foot of the several short flights of steps opening from the porticos, the outer one four feet lower. The two levels are to be connected by flights of steps opposite those from the porticos. (The arrangement will be most readily understood from the small section on the right.) In line with these lower flights, and following the division between the two levels, there is to be a channel eight feet wide and four feet deep, the bottom of it on the lower level, the top a little higher than the upper. (See section on the right.) This is to be filled with soil and planted and decorated in the Italian manner of gardening, consistently with the architectural style of the Capitol. Sufficient openings are to be made through the outer wall of this terrace garden for lighting and ventilating the corridor below. By thus setting the outer part of the terrace at a lower level than the inner part, its parapet will not harmfully obstruct views from or toward the building, while it is believed that the architectural effect to result will be in all other respects fitting and satisfactory.
The Committee is asked to consider:
That it is more than twenty years since the problem of a suitable treatment of the northern, western and southern bases of the Capitol was first forced upon Congress; that the present plan has been prepared under special orders of Congress as a solution of it; that it is five years since it was presented [580
]
Plan of “esplanade” of proposed U.S. Capitol terrace
Two details show the line of sight made possible by two-tiered form of terrace.
And in view of these considerations the question whether it is sound economy to further delay entering upon the work is respectfully submitted.
FREDERICK LAW OLMSTED, Landscape Architect.